Is india in reality the maximum risky country for ladies?

a survey carried out by means of the thomson reuters basis has ranked india as the world's most risky u . s . for ladies, in advance of afghanistan, syria and saudi arabia. however is that this simply real?

the ballot  surveyed 548 professionals on six extraordinary indices - healthcare, discrimination, cultural traditions, sexual and non-sexual violence, and human trafficking. they have been first asked to name the 5 maximum dangerous countries from the listing of 193 united nations member states. and then they have been asked to call the worst u . s . a . in every of the above categories. india crowned three - cultural traditions, sexual violence and human trafficking.

a comparable ballot  seven years in the past had ranked india fourth, with afghanistan top of the list.

the new survey has been criticised in india, with many questioning how countries like saudi arabia and afghanistan, which grant far fewer rights to ladies, managed to perform better.

the united states's national fee for girls rejected it outright, pronouncing that countries wherein girls could not communicate out had executed higher. in addition they mentioned that rape, harassment and other forms of violence in opposition to ladies seem to have risen in india because greater cases are being suggested, driven with the aid of public outrage.

the ministry of ladies and infant development said in a announcement that the usage of "an opinion ballot  to peg india because the most dangerous united states for girls is genuinely an effort to malign the state and draw attention faraway from actual enhancements visible in latest years".

how did the report reach this end?

it is based absolutely at the opinion and verdict of the 548 professionals. they include teachers, policymakers, journalists and those operating in healthcare or other development sectors.

the muse's head, monique villa, informed bbc international service that forty one of the specialists have been indian. however there may be no clarity approximately the nationality of the opposite specialists and the way broadly other nations have been represented. moreover, the file states that of 759 experts contacted, best 548 spoke back - no different information about them is to be had.

sanjay kumar, director of the centre for the have a look at of growing societies (csds), certainly one of india's pinnacle impartial research enterprises, stated this "loss of transparency" turned into extraordinarily demanding. "how have been these human beings chosen? what is the gender divide? wherein are they from? this is very vital to recognize, however there's no statistics available on it," he stated.

however roop rekha verma, a university professor and social activist, welcomed the file.

"i am no longer unhappy about this file and its findings - it's miles sufficient to make us sit up straight," she said. "a higher technique, rooted in extensive records and empirical work, could have been used of route, but if extra than 500 gender experts view it like this, it needs to be taken seriously. those aren't perceptions from humans on the street - those are well-informed experts."

become the proper method used?
no, consistent with mr kumar. he factors out that authorities or different public statistics is to be had for a few of the parameters used to rank nations, and to ignore that during favour of belief is an "excessive shortcut".

"records, even if unreliable, need to form the basis of any rating. belief need to shape the basis for a rating most effective while there is no to be had facts," he stated.

why india's rape disaster suggests no signs and symptoms of abating
changed into delhi gang rape india's #metoo moment?
mr kumar added that the survey admitting to use "blended method" - that could be a mix of face-to-face, on line and speak to interviews - turned into also very difficult.

"i can tell you from revel in that specific interview strategies usually provide you with one-of-a-kind outcomes. there needs to be one base. it seems that in this example the interviews had been carried out on the premise of convenience - possible simplest count on this as no similarly rationalization is given.

"this is no manner to conduct a survey - in particular one that you are publicising so much. it's a shortcut and have to no longer be taken significantly."